Monae Johnson questioned vote-counting machines. Running elections changed her mind.

Four years after far-right Republicans helped elect Monae Johnson as South Dakota secretary of state, sheâs .
The cross-party endorsement is unusual. But the more interesting story is how Johnson got to this point, Ìę°ù±đ±èŽÇ°ùłÙČő.
Johnson ousted a GOP incumbent in 2022 with support from activists who distrusted electronic vote-counting machines and wanted South Dakota to rely more heavily â or entirely â on hand-counting. Her own rhetoric was plenty skeptical, too.
In a fundraising letter that spring, Â that âall across America weâve seen questionable results in national, state, and local elections.â Asked that fall whether Joe Biden legitimately won the 2020 election, she : âIâm not going to acknowledge that.â After she won, she said â,â citing warnings from âIT people, military people,â and floated restricting the use of vote-counting machines.
But once Johnson became responsible for running elections herself, her views started to change. By 2024, she was  in tabulators and saying South Dakotaâs election system had safeguards âbuilt in throughout the process.â And this summer, Johnson told , âI trust the county auditors to do their jobs, and I fully support the use of secure, tested ballot tabulators.â
Former Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, a Democrat, said she has seen the same evolution play out among poll workers and county officials: People sometimes get involved in elections because they are skeptical of how they work. Then they discover that the problems they expected to find are not there and that some of the fixes they imagined are not workable.
âItâs a brave thing to admit,â Boockvar said. She said she could not recall another example of a statewide election official doing so.
More common are local versions of the same story. Â
For example, Michelle Burchill â a Republican and supporter of President Donald Trump â went to work for Yavapai County, Arizona, in 2020 after absorbing many of Trumpâs claims about rigged elections. On her first day, she watched workers stop when two parts of the operation were off by a single ballot, then search until they found two ballots stuck together. âI was an election skeptic, for sure,â she  last month. Watching the process âvery humbly wokeâ her up. Today, she serves as one of the countyâs top election officials.
In Pennsylvania, registered Republican Jay Schneider signed up to work elections after 2020, still suspicious that there had been âshenanigans.â After serving as a poll worker and training to become a judge of elections, he  that seeing the safeguards firsthand changed his view.
In Californiaâs Shasta County, Tom Toller took over an elections office that had spent years at the center of. He arrived with no election experience, skeptical of voting machines and willing to consider hand-counting â or even undertake a legal fight with the state over it. Four months later, after âgetting underneath the hoodâ of the system, he: Hand-counting was slow and expensive, while properly run machines were fast and accurate.
These stories are not about people changing their politics. They are about what happens when a campaign promise becomes an administrative problem.
Johnson appears to have confronted that gap early.
One of Johnsonâs first major projects was turning her campaign promise of post-election audits into something counties could actually carry out. Â who runs , to help lead the work, despite criticism from some of the conservative activists who had helped put Johnson in office.
Johnson also  of people who had already taken opposing sides on election policy. For example, activist Vicky Buhr had  of banning ranked-choice voting, while Democratic state Rep. Kameron Nelson was one of just five House members who  the ban. Over three meetings, the group worked out how the audits would function and eventually .
The system they helped implement required counties to hand count ballots in 5% of precincts and compare them with machine results. When counties carried out those audits in 2024, the results repeatedly corroborated the tabulators. âThe accuracy and transparency demonstrated by this process highlight the strength of our election system,â Johnson said  announcing the results.
Hand-counting had become a way to corroborate the machines rather than an argument for eliminating them.
Many of the activists who helped elect Johnson in 2022 remained unconvinced. This summer, they backed state Rep. Heather Baxter, whose campaign had called for hand-counted paper ballots and eliminating machines, for secretary of state instead. Republican convention delegates chose Baxter over Johnson, . Johnson is now backing Democrat Terrence Davis in the general election, who  South Dakotaâs current election system and statewide hand-counting as the primary method of tallying ballots. Â
In explaining her endorsement, Johnson wrote that she now knows âthe difference between campaigning for this office and carrying the responsibility of leading it.â The job, she wrote, requires âthe humility to listen to professionalsâ and âa willingness to review new information and change course when the evidence supports doing so.â
Nearly 200 candidates who have promoted false or unsupported claims about elections are on the ballot this fall for Congress or statewide office, . Some are seeking jobs that would put them much closer to the machinery of elections themselves.
Johnsonâs story suggests that proximity can do something an argument sometimes cannot: replace assumptions with the tedious, technical reality of how elections actually work.
 was produced by  and reviewed and distributed by ±ŹÁÏTV.







