The Trump administrationās multiple investigations of the 2020 election may have more to do with 2026
The Trump administrationās multiple investigations of the 2020 election may have more to do with 2026
The FBI agents arrived at David Bolterās Milwaukee home on a cool, cloudy Wednesday morning in late May. They were armed with a list of questions for the 2020 poll worker, who had raised concerns about the way local officials handled the 2020 election, Bolter told Votebeat.
President Donald Trump in an that sought to throw out more than 220,000 votes. That would have been more than enough to move Wisconsinās 10 electoral votes from Democrat Joe Biden, who won the state, to Trump. Though courts, several election reviews, and many audits , the Republican never stopped believing that he was cheated out of the presidency in 2020.
That appears to be why, last month, the to question Bolter as part of an expanding national effort by the second Trump administration to investigate long-debunked claims of fraud in the 2020 election.
dug into the Trump administrationās various investigations of the 2020 election and explained how those efforts could impact the midterms in 2026.
The investigation into the 2020 election appears to be relying on already disproven allegations from people like Bolter. Bolter declined to divulge more about his conversation with the FBI, which has not been previously reported, but allegations from Bolterās 2020 affidavit were central to some conspiracy theories about the 2020 election. For example, he alleged that somebody in Milwaukeeās absentee ballot counting facility announced around midnight on Election Day that a āhuge truckload of ballotsā was going to be delivered ā an accusation for which there has so far appeared to be no additional evidence.
Around the same time Bolter says he talked to the FBI, two plainclothes agents with FBI badges showed up at the apartment of a former Milwaukee resident and 2020 poll worker about an affidavit she submitted, according to the former poll worker, who asked to be identified only by her first name, Christine, to give her the freedom to discuss an ongoing investigation.
Christine had also submitted an affidavit about the 2020 election, saying election workers had been told that all votes were counted, but she then saw workers continuing to count ballots around midnight. That affidavit was the focus of the agentsā questions, Christine told Votebeat.
āI suspected wrongdoing, but Iām not saying that it actually happened,ā she said. āIām just one lowly person that was working there.ā
During the interview, she added, an agent showed her a photograph of , asking her if she recognized the former election official who has been central to false allegations about the 2020 election. She identified her by name. Woodall didnāt respond to a request for comment.
Caroline Clancy, a spokesperson for the FBIās Milwaukee office, declined to comment.
While investigators seem mainly focused on the 2020 vote, some elections experts believe the Trump administrationās wide-ranging probe is actually designed to create more doubts among Americans about future elections, as Republicans face strong political headwinds that could cost them control of Congress later this year.
āThis isnāt about the 2020 election, this is about the 2026 and 2028 elections,ā said David Becker, executive director of the nonpartisan, nonprofit Center for Election Innovation and Research. āThis is about intimidating election officials. This is about creating a stream of disinformation designed to delegitimize an election the president may believe heās going to lose. This is designed by the presidentās underlings to satisfy the unrealistic expectations of a president that still cannot comprehend that he lost an election that he definitely lost, and itās incredibly destabilizing.ā
Wisconsin is the latest known target of the Trump administrationās 2020 investigation. The FBI is looking to interview elections officials and Milwaukee police officers in what some worry could be a precursor to an effort to seize ballots from the 2020 presidential race, as it already has in Georgia.
The Trump administration is revisiting allegations of election fraud that have been repeatedly scrutinized
In January, federal investigators in Fulton County, Georgia. The heavily Democratic county, home to Atlanta, was key to Bidenās narrow 2020 victory in the state.
As in Wisconsin, the FBI in Georgia has on allegations that have already been repeatedly scrutinized by audits, investigations, and courts without unearthing any evidence of fraud or tampering that could have overturned the results.
The Georgia search represented an unprecedented intervention by the federal government into local administration. Even more unusually, Tulsi Gabbard, who will step down at the end of this month as director of national intelligence, personally oversaw the seizure and arranged for via cell phone after they carried out the operation.
The Trump administration investigations stretch from Arizona, where federal officials of a partisan review state lawmakers conducted of Maricopa Countyās 2020 election, to Puerto Rico, where the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to examine for potential security risks.
The administrationās investigations arenāt entirely limited to 2020. The U.S. Department of Justice to Wayne County, Michigan ā home to Detroit ā demanding all ballots cast in the 2024 election, which Trump won. But even in that case, to support the request, the Justice Department , including a lawsuit that was quickly dismissed after a judge wrote that āplaintiffsā interpretation of events is incorrect and not credible.ā Wayne County , because it doesnāt have possession of them.
What do the 2020 elections mean for 2026?
The FBI faces challenges in pursuing cases tied to the 2020 election since the five-year statute of limitations that applies to most of the likely charges expired last year. Law enforcement veterans said it is possible that the Justice Department could pursue broader conspiracy charges in the case, but the prospect remains unclear.
FBI Director Kash Patel suggested in April that the , but that has not yet occurred. Officials with the FBI and Justice Department did not respond to requests for comment.
John Keller, a former acting head of the Justice Departmentās Public Integrity Section who resigned in 2025 after refusing the Trump administrationās demands to drop corruption charges against then-New York City Mayor Eric Adams, said the administration appeared to be trying to normalize federal investigations of state elections to pave the way for future intervention.
āThey are using enforcement directed at the 2020 election as a test run for what they can get away with on Election Day this year, or after, to try and delay certification or invalidate an electionā if the results donāt go their way, he said.
Injecting federal law enforcement officials into an ongoing election is a more extreme and serious action than investigating a past one, and it could face stiffer opposition. But itās clear, at least, that the administration is scrutinizing current elections closely.
Trump last week in its primary election and asserted that Democrats were trying to steal the election and . Last month, Trump also said he wasto investigate an error that led to some voters in Maryland receiving ballots for the wrong party in the stateās upcoming primary. in have explained the true causes of the issues and that nothing nefarious was behind them.
Any effort to seize ballots in an ongoing election would create unprecedented new issues, such as a breach in the over cast ballots, that could prevent election officials from declaring a winner and throw results into uncertainty.
Catherine Engelbrecht, co-founder of the Texas-based conservative group True the Vote, which , said she understands Trumpās intentions but believes the 2020 election questions should have been resolved āin the immediate aftermath of the 2020 election.ā
āThis is not necessarily the way I would have recommended that it would be handled,ā she said. āThe fact that it wasnāt addressed has left this lingering void.ā
In most cases, however, Trumpās claims of voter fraud were addressed in the wake of the 2020 election. Time and again, , , and even the concluded that there was no evidence of problems or fraud that would have changed the results.
Engelbrecht said she views the Trump administrationās ongoing investigations as an effort to dig into long-standing concerns about the voting process it wants to address for future elections.
āThe past is prologue,ā she said. āIf we donāt understand what happened, we are doomed to repeat it.ā
was produced by and reviewed and distributed by ±¬ĮĻTV.
