As birds migrate south for the winter, they bring H5N1 to poultry farms. Most infected chickens will die, and the primary defense is culling. In the U.S., more than 166 million chickens have been culled since 2022, though a lull in cases .
To prevent spread, biosecurity has become the key watchword. For poultry farmers, that such as limiting human interaction with flocks, washing hands and boots, and wearing face masks. But the virus just keeps spilling over from wild birds into farmers' flocks. Part of the problem, Pitesky says, is that poultry farms are often located near water sources, like lagoons and rain ponds, where migrating birds roost overnight, putting wild and domestic animals in close proximity. It's a gut virus in wild birds, and it spreads easily through their feces.
In February 2025, the U.S. Department of Agriculture in additional funds to combat highly pathogenic avian flu, including support for biosecurity, financial relief for farmers and vaccine research. Companies have designed bird vaccines against H5-containing highly pathogenic avian influenza for a couple of decades, updating them as the virus evolved. The USDA announced in January 2025 that it would of vaccines for chickens, and Zoetis of Parsippany, New Jersey, recently created an updated version. It's based on a strain that was circulating in 2022 and has continued to do so, says senior vice president for global biologics research and development Mahesh Kumar, who works in Zoetis' Kalamazoo, Michigan, facility.
The vaccine is effective at preventing symptoms and death, but does not prevent infection or viral transmission, Kumar says. Zoetis' past vaccines have been used in a handful of other nations for poultry and one even was used by the US Fish & Wildlife Service to protect in 2023.
In early 2025, the USDA for that new formula, but this preliminary licensure is just a step along the way to use, not permission to market or sell the vaccine widely. In fact, the US has for highly pathogenic avian flu, though poultry receive a number of other vaccines.
There are concerns that vaccination could push the virus to mutate faster. But the big issue blocking vaccination is that doing so could limit international poultry trade, and the U.S. is a . A vaccinated animal could carry the virus without symptoms, and many nations don't want birds that might be invisibly carrying H5N1.
To get around that problem, Zoetis' vaccine has a twist. In preparing inactivated virus, the scientists used the N2 neuraminidase, instead of the N1 that H5 has recently buddied up with. That provides a way to check whether birds have antibodies that would indicate they've been exposed to the vaccine's N2, to the real virus's N1, or to both.
Still, it is uncertain whether the U.S. would ever broadly deploy an avian flu vaccine. Pitesky says that much of the power rests with farmers who raise broiler chickens for meat and export; broilers of U.S. poultry sales. If the broiler farmers aren't on board, he believes it's unlikely the USDA would promote vaccination. The decision might end up being made at a state-by-state level, depending on regional poultry industries, suggests Rocio Crespo, a veterinary researcher at North Carolina State University in Raleigh.
Kumar says Zoetis could turn stockpiled materials into ready-to-use vaccine in two months or less, depending on how close to finished form the vaccine is in storage. "We want to be ready," he says.
Spillover to dairies
And now the poultry industry's catastrophe has become the dairy industry's problem, too. The virus's 2024 appearance in Texas dairies was a surprise for flu experts: "The literature suggested that dairy cows don't get influenza A's," says Pitesky 鈥� but, "as the joke goes, cows don't read the literature." Dairies were caught off guard, that exist for poultry. And according to some reports, they've been .
Cows infected with H5N1 usually survive, though they must be taken out of the regular population and spend weeks in a hospital barn. Inflammation in their udders, or mastitis, turns their milk thick and yellowish; splashes of contaminated milk in the milking parlors for the virus to move from animal to animal. (One study suggested that more widespread or respiratory infection , and there's no sign yet that beef cattle have been affected.)
The USDA now requires the 48 contiguous states for H5N1. That testing identified two new spillovers of H5N1 into dairy herds, in and , reported in February of 2025.
And, worryingly, that virus was a different version than the one that infected cows in 2024. That 2024 spillover featured an H5N1 with a particular collection of flu gene sequences, still H5 2.3.4.4b, called B3.13. But flu viruses evolve rapidly, and that H5 2.3.4.4b has shuffled genes with other viruses more than once, creating lots of and subvariants. More recently, another variant called D1.1 has been spreading in wild birds. While B3.13 still accounts for most cattle infections, it's D1.1 that hopped into dairies in early 2025.
The long-term implications for cattle of D1.1, and avian flu in general, aren't yet clear. "We're really hoping this has just been a unique set of circumstances and that we don't get any more spillover events," says Jamie Jonker, chief science officer of the National Milk Producers Federation in Arlington, Virginia. But, he adds, "we'd like a vaccine to be in the toolbox and to understand how it can be used." Zoetis and other companies are for cows, though it's too soon to know if and how such vaccines would be deployed.
Even with vaccines, though, "we may not be able to put out this fire," says Gregory Gray, an infectious disease epidemiologist at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston. "It appears, to many of us, that these viruses are going to be endemic, or we say 'enzootic,' for a long time."
People on the safe side鈥攆or now
What kind of risk does all this pose for people? Gray has studied a number of viruses in cattle and other animals, and he says that while spillovers from one species to another are common, it's rare that a virus adapts to spread easily in the new species. As of spring 2025, there are no confirmed cases of human-to-human H5N1 transmission in the United States.
"It's not like in the movies," Gray says. "It's going to take continual spillover events for it to get a foothold." But it can happen, as it did in 2009, when an H1N1 influenza A virus with a novel mix of genes , where it then spread widely. This caused a pandemic, killing an estimated 123,000 to 203,000 people worldwide, a death toll grossly eclipsed by the more than 7 million .
To become adept at infecting humans, the virus would have to change the structure of its hemagglutinin. Its current version sticks to a on the surface of bird cells. The birdlike sugar arrangement is found in cow udders, explaining the mastitis.
Humans do have this birdlike sugar arrangement, but it's buried deep in the lungs, making the virus hard to catch and hard to spread to another person. It's also present in human eyes, which could explain why pinkeye in people who caught bird flu in the U.S. in 2024 (many also experienced fever and respiratory symptoms). But for ongoing person-to-person transmission through coughs, sneezes and sniffles, researchers think H5N1 would have to mutate to recognize a sugar arrangement found in the human upper respiratory tract鈥攖he nose, nasal cavity, sinuses, mouth, throat and voice box.
It would also have to make changes to the protein that copies its genes, the viral polymerase. This polymerase would need to switch from working well with bird proteins to working well with human ones. It has done that, to some extent: Some versions of H5N1 have that help it replicate in mammal cells. But as of spring 2025, none of the viruses that have jumped from cows to humans have hemagglutinin mutations that are predicted to support person-to-person transmission, Friedrich says.
H5N1 could either evolve on its own, or trade genes with another human-infecting flu. The latter possibility is particularly concerning at times of high rates of seasonal flu, such as . The more flu virus floating around, the more chances for two kinds to meet in the same cell in the same animal and exchange genes, to birth something new and potentially dangerous.
Factors beyond the virus itself influence pandemic risk, too. "There are a lot of things that have to align, not only on the virus side, but also on the people side," says Valerie Le Sage, a virologist at the University of Pittsburgh who cowrote an overview of in the 2023 Annual Review of Virology.
One of them is disease history. From recent experiments with ferrets, which get and transmit the virus similarly to the way people do, Le Sage suspects that people who've had flu before鈥攖hat's most people over the age of 5鈥攎ight have enough immunity to stifle the worst consequences of H5N1 flu. In her experiments, ferrets earlier exposed to the 2009 H1N1 swine flu from the worst symptoms and death when later exposed to H5N1 from Texas cattle. Ferrets that were just given H5N1 flu got sick and died. "I can't tell you exactly how long this protection lasts, but it is nice to see," says Le Sage.
Also good news is the observation that the virus isn't hitting anywhere near the reported 50 percent mortality rate in recent U.S. infections. Such rates are imperfect calculations, Friedrich notes, as they are based on people who were sick enough to get tested for H5N1; people who didn't get very ill would not be tallied as survivors. That would artificially inflate the death rate, though it's unclear how much this has affected calculations. Asymptomatic infections may not be uncommon, at least in current U.S. cases: A recent CDC study found that three dairy veterinarians had antibodies to H5N1, indicating they'd been infected, but had.
The other gene variants that H5N1 has acquired also seem to be a factor, and here the news may be less good. The earlier B3.13 virus seemed to cause mild infections, says David Hamer, a public health epidemiologist at the Boston University Center on Emerging Infectious Diseases. From 2024 through spring 2025, the CDC , of any type, in the U.S., and most The one person who died was over 65 and 鈥攂ut he also had the newer D1.1 strain, who became severely ill.
Although it's not fully clear what D1.1 means for people, it could be bad news, speculates Friedrich. "I have this gut feeling, and colleagues of mine do too, that something about the D1.1 genotype may be more permissive for mutations that adapt the virus to humans," he says.