±¬ÁÏTV

MoneyGeek analyzed 95 of the largest cities in the United States to find the best and worst places for job seekers in 2023. We looked at each community's growth in employment during the last 12 months and for the previous three years, growth in hourly wages over the last 12 months, current unemployment rate, current labor force size and average monthly wage over monthly rent ratio to determine our rankings. The most important factors — including growth in employment during the last 12 months and three years and growth in hourly wages — were double-weighted (22%), while the other factors each contributed 11%.

The best cities for job seekers have impressive job and wage growth, low job competition and affordable housing prices; in other words, they provide solid employment opportunities and low-cost living.

TOP 15 CITIES FOR JOB SEEKERS IN 2023

1. Jacksonville, FL - Score: 99.0
2. Provo, UT - Score: 95.8
3. Dallas, TX - Score: 93.1
4. Lakeland, FL - Score: 90.1
5. Tampa, FL - Score: 87.8
6. Austin, TX - Score: 84.5
7. Palm Bay, FL - Score: 84.5
8. Boise City, ID - Score: 82.7
9. North Port, FL - Score: 80.4
10. Cape Coral, FL - Score: 79.0
11. Raleigh, NC - Score: 76.0
12. Ogden, UT - Score: 76.0
13. Deltona, FL - Score: 75.1
14. Orlando, FL - Score: 74.6
15. Phoenix, AZ - Score: 73.1
Ìý

Among the best cities for job seekers, we found that some of the top cities for jobs, livable wages and opportunity also had a higher-than-average concentration of Gen Z residents. Of the cities we analyzed, Gen Zers constituted 9.1% of the population, on average. Below are the five cities ranked in the 20 best cities that also have an above-average Gen Z population; these could be excellent places for young people new to the job market to find opportunity and community.Ìý

TOP 5 CITIES FOR GEN Z JOB SEEKERS IN 2023
1.ÌýProvo, UT | Score: 95.8 | Gen Z Population: 16.4%
2.ÌýAustin, TX | Score: 84.5 | Gen Z Pop: 9.3%
3.ÌýOgden, UT | Score: 76.0 | Gen Z Pop: 9.5%
4.ÌýRiverside, CA | Score: 71.9 | Gen Z Pop.: 9.6%
5.ÌýSalt Lake City, UT | Score: 70.8 | Gen Z Pop: 9.6%

While the top cities on our list are affordable, growing and relatively uncompetitive, the worst cities for job seekers tend to have slower wage and job growth, less affordable housing relative to income and competitive job markets. These 15 cities ranked the lowest on our list. Notably, Ohio cities have three entries in the bottom of the list.Ìý

WORST CITIES FOR JOB SEEKERS IN 2023

1. Akron, OH - Score: 1.0
2. Bridgeport, CT - Score: 5.7
3. Worcester, MA - Score: 7.0
4. Urban Honolulu, HI - Score: 9.4
5. Milwaukee, WI - Score: 12.0
6. Oxnard, CA - Score: 19.3
7. San Francisco, CA - Score: 19.7
8. New York, NY - Score: 20.5
9. Los Angeles, CA - Score: 20.5
10. Cincinnati, OH - Score: 22.1
11. Boston, MA - Score: 23.7
12. Richmond, VA - Score: 24.7
13. Hartford, CT - Score: 24.7
14. Providence, RI - Score: 24.7
15. Dayton, OH - Score: 24.8

MoneyGeek ranked the best and worst cities using four key factors — job growth, wage growth, unemployment rate and housing-to-income ratio — to better understand which cities best served those seeking employment and which fell flat. These factors all contribute to what makes a city attractive or less-than-ideal for job seekers; many cities excel in some areas but fall short in others.

To better understand how well or poorly cities performed in each of our ranking categories, MoneyGeek found the best (and worst) cities for each category. You can find those rankings — along with a brief description of their significance — below.

In 2023, the majority of the best cities for job growth in the last 12 months are concentrated in Florida, while 4 of the 5 worst cities for job growth are in the Midwest.

BEST CITIES FOR JOB GROWTH

1. Jacksonville, FL (5.6%)
2. Tampa, FL (5.4%)
3. Orlando, FL (5.2%)
4. Las Vegas, Nevada (5.1%)
5. Riverside, CA (5.0%)

WORST CITIES FOR JOB GROWTH

1. Milwaukee, WI (-1.7%)
2. Madison, WI (-1.1%)
3. Columbia, SC (-0.7%)
4. Cincinnati, OH (-0.6)%
5. Akron, OH (-0.5%)

When wages grow, a city is doing something right. Palm Bay, Florida's 12-month wage growth tops MoneyGeek's list with 6.3% wage growth. Meanwhile, San Francisco, California, experienced a 12.2% wage decline since 2022.Ìý

BEST CITIES FOR WAGE GROWTH

1. Palm Bay, FL (6.3%)
2. Lakeland, FL (5.6%)
3. Cape Coral, FL (5.2%)
4. Deltona, FL (4.7%)
5. Ogden, UT (4.4%)

WORST CITIES FOR WAGE GROWTH

1. San Francisco, CA (-12.2%)
2. San Jose, CA (-8.4%)
3. New York, NY (-7.4%)
4. Bridgeport, CT (-6.8%)
5. Boston, MA (-3.9%)

Naturally, it's a good sign for a job seeker if you see a city with low unemployment; ultimately, it means your odds of being hired at a new job should be pretty good. Provo, Utah, is MoneyGeek's standout in this category, with just 2% unemployment.

CITIES WITH THE LOWEST UNEMPLOYMENT RATESÌý

1. Provo, UT (2.0%)
2. Ogden, UT (2.1%)
3. Salt Lake City, UT (2.2%)
4. Miami, FL (2.2%)
5. Minneapolis, MN (2.2%)

CITIES WITH THE HIGHEST UNEMPLOYMENT RATES

1. Bakersfield, CA (7.2%)
2. McAllen, TX (7.0%)
3. Fresno, CA (6.4%)
4. Las Vegas, NV (5.6%)
5. Stockton, CA (5.4%)

A city's housing-to-income ratio roughly translates to its affordability; the less money you spend on rent and housing compared to your overall income, the more money you have for everything else. That's why your money goes much further in Springfield, Massachusetts, than in more expensive cities like Oxnard, California, or Honolulu, Hawaii. In Springfield, monthly rent costs just under 22% of your income, on average. After paying for housing in Oxnard or Honolulu, you'll have to spend more than half of your income on housing and be left with the other half to cover all other expenses.

CITIES WITH THE BEST HOUSING-TO-INCOME RATIOSÌý

1. Springfield, MA (21.9%)
2. Cleveland, OH (22.2%)
3. St. Louis, MO (22.5%)
4. Toledo, OH (22.9%)
5. Dayton, OH (23.3%)

CITIES WITH THE WORST HOUSING-TO-INCOME RATIOS

1. Oxnard, CA (54.1%)
2. Urban Honolulu, HI (51.7%)
3. Providence, RI (48.9%)
4. Los Angeles, CA (47.7%)
5. San Diego, CA (46.0%)

Relocating to a new city to find a job can be time-consuming and expensive, especially if this isn't a cross-town journey and you're moving out of state. If you're going to move to a new city without having a job lined up, we recommend considering the following:

Ensure you have adequate savings.
as much as possible to ensure you have a financial safety net in your new city. After all, you may move somewhere the jobs are plentiful, but the interview process could take longer than you imagine. A robust savings account also means you can be choosier about the jobs you pick, and you'll have something to sustain you if your first job doesn't last long.

Try not to rely too much on credit cards.
Yes, credit cards are an indispensable cash flow tool and, if you have a , an excellent way to make money. Use your credit cards well, and those cash back rewards could mean significant savings on your purchases. But if you move somewhere without a job and don't find employment immediately, the credit card debt you're accruing could eventually mean that much of your future paycheck will be devoted to .

Research your new city and make a plan.
As in, figure out where you may live. Will you start off in a hotel or an apartment complex? Or somewhere in between? Have you used a to crunch the numbers and see what it will cost you to live there, including things like ? when you cross state lines can make a lot of sense. The more information you have, the better you'll feel about your decision.

To rank the best cities for job seekers, MoneyGeek calculated three factors using earnings data and employment statistics from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and median rent rates reported by the Department of Housing and Urban Development to estimate how good a city is for someone seeking jobs. We analyzed data for 95 cities with labor forces of at least 300,000 across the U.S.

The first factor we calculated is overall growth, which incorporates the trends in jobs created and trends in wages.

The next consideration is job competition, which includes the unemployment rate and the overall size of the employment numbers reflecting greater absolute availability of jobs.

The final factor is housing affordability, which captures the ratio of wages over rents to indicate an area's cost of living.

Additionally, MoneyGeek used 2021 U.S. Census Bureau data to analyze which cities had a higher-than-average population of Generation Z residents for job-seeking new college graduates.

MoneyGeek used the following metrics in our analysis:

- Growth in employment, last 12 months: 22% weight (double weight)
-ÌýGrowth in employment, last three years: 22% weight (double weight)
-ÌýGrowth in hourly wages, last 12 months: 22% weight (double weight)
-ÌýUnemployment rate, current: 11% weight (full weight)
- Size of labor force: 11% weight (full weight)
-ÌýMonthly wages over monthly rents ratio: 11% weight (full weight)

The individual factors were ranked as follows:

- Overall Growth: Growth in employment over the last 12 months (44% weight), growth in employment over the last 36 months (22% weight), hourly wage growth in the last 12 months (33% weight). In the overall ranking, this is 45% of the overall weight.

- Job Competition: Unemployment rate (78% weight) and size of the labor force (22% weight). In the overall ranking, this is 45% of the overall weight.

- Housing Affordability: Wages over rents ratio (100% weight). This is 10% of the overall weight.

- For the purposes of this analysis, only metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) with labor forces of at least 300,000 were considered in the ranking.

SOURCES

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. "." Accessed February 28, 2023.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. "." Accessed February 2, 2023.

United States Census Bureau. "." Accessed February 2, 2023.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. "." Accessed February 2, 2023.

Ìýwas produced by Ìýand reviewed and distributed by ±¬ÁÏTV Media.