Robinhood wants to be the Costco of finance
Robinhood wants to be the Costco of finance
When Robinhood thinks about how it positions its program, it doesn鈥檛 just look at other brokerages or financial services apps for inspiration. It looks at companies like Costco.
鈥淲e want it to be the best deal in financial services,鈥 Abhishek Fatehpuria, Robinhood鈥檚 vice president of product management for brokerage, told in a about how the company builds products.
鈥淭here are a lot of analogs we look at that are not in the financial services industry that we respect a lot when we think about Gold. We think about Costco as a model for what we want to do with Gold. You buy the Costco membership and you just know the moment you walk into a Costco, you鈥檙e getting the best deal and the best products, no matter what you鈥檙e buying.鈥
Amazon Prime, he added, is another reference point 鈥 a successful membership business alongside Netflix and Spotify. 鈥淲hen we think about what we aspire for Robinhood Gold to be, it鈥檚 kind of the best deal in financial services.鈥
It鈥檚 an unusual framing for a brokerage, and it helps explain not only why Robinhood looks the way it does today but also where it鈥檚 headed.
A different way of building
Fatehpuria joined Robinhood as an intern in 2016, three years after the company launched. At the time, Robinhood had about 40 people working out of a small office in Palo Alto. Nearly a decade later, he鈥檚 overseeing a product surface that now spans , options, futures, , a credit card, and an AI assistant called Cortex. Most recently, the team launched agentic trading, which allows customers to authorize a third-party AI agent to execute trades in a dedicated, customer-funded Robinhood account.
For a company shipping that much, that fast, the natural question is how it all fits together. Open the Robinhood app today and the surface area is genuinely large 鈥 but the products feel intentional rather than bolted on. To Finder, which has and products extensively over the years, the coherence is unusual for a fintech expanding this fast.
Fatehpuria said it鈥檚 intentional. The team鈥檚 first criterion for any new product is whether it would succeed on its own, independent of Robinhood鈥檚 existing customer base.
鈥淓ach product we have independently should be successful,鈥 he explained. 鈥淚f it has to ride the coattails of one of our existing products, it probably means that product in and of itself isn鈥檛 the best version of that product.鈥
He pointed to the and the as examples 鈥 products he believes would attract customers regardless of whether the rest of Robinhood existed. Only after a product passes that bar does the team start thinking about how it fits into the larger ecosystem.
鈥淎 lot of products jump to the second step very early,鈥 he said. 鈥淭hey鈥檙e like, 鈥極kay, I鈥檝e already got this huge base of users, I have a very successful product, now let me just add things onto it.鈥 One thing we鈥檙e very intentional about is: 鈥榃ill these products be independently amazing?鈥欌
A lesson learned
For all of Robinhood鈥檚 product velocity, not everything has landed. Asked about a lesson the team learned the hard way, Fatehpuria pointed to a recent example.
鈥淎 couple years ago, we had this bigger redesign of the Robinhood app that we had tried. It was modular 鈥 you could move little widgets around on the screen. We didn鈥檛 roll it out very widely, but it was a big overhaul, a big change from how it鈥檚 worked for 10 years. Customers didn鈥檛 love it. The numbers showed that it wasn鈥檛 really working.鈥
Robinhood took a different direction. Since then, the team鈥檚 approach to evolving the core app has shifted to something more incremental 鈥 tweaks to navigation, search improvements, performance upgrades 鈥 rather than sweeping redesigns.
鈥淭hat was a big lesson for a lot of us,鈥 Fatehpuria said.
The discipline of saying no
One of the more striking things about how Fatehpuria talks about product is his framing of restraint. Customers constantly ask Robinhood for new products, but not every request becomes a roadmap item.
鈥淭here鈥檚 a lot of things every year that we say no to,鈥 he said. 鈥淔or me, when we鈥檙e talking about the roadmap, there鈥檚 a distinction between someone saying they want something and it being the reason they would leave the platform. I would much rather be in a position where a customer is like, 鈥業 love what Robinhood has to offer, but they don鈥檛 quite offer the exact thing I need yet, but when they offer it, I鈥檒l come to Robinhood,鈥 than be in the position where they鈥檙e saying Robinhood offers everything, but it鈥檚 not great.鈥
That approach can frustrate vocal customers. Fatehpuria acknowledged he sees the complaints 鈥 particularly from active traders. 鈥淚鈥檒l look on Twitter and I鈥檒l see the complaint. Someone鈥檚 a super active trader, and they鈥檙e like, 鈥榃hy is Robinhood spending all this time building this other thing that doesn鈥檛 really matter to me?鈥 And the answer is because that matters to a lot of people. Maybe it doesn鈥檛 matter to that specific person.鈥
A feature most customers don鈥檛 know about
Asked what feature he thinks is underused, something Robinhood customers would get more value from if they knew it existed, Fatehpuria said the multiple brokerage accounts feature the company launched last year.
鈥淚t really helps you separate your strategies, which is a big thing for investors. I might have my actively traded portfolio on one side, and then my dividend, long-term investing portfolio. That feature really helps me separate the two, watch their PL [profit and loss] differently, see how each is independently doing.鈥
He said it鈥檚 underused partly because of discovery, partly because of education and partly because it requires some setup. 鈥淚t takes a little bit of work because you have to open a new account. We try to make it as seamless as possible. But it鈥檚 really, really powerful. The customers who use it end up loving Robinhood a lot more.鈥
What鈥檚 next: AI as the interface
The conversation eventually turned to where Robinhood is headed, and Fatehpuria was direct about one thing: AI is core to the product鈥檚 future.
Cortex, Robinhood鈥檚 family of AI products, is approaching one million users, he said. The current lineup includes stock-level digests, portfolio-level digests and a conversational assistant that鈥檚 still being iterated on.
The hardest part of building AI in a financial-services context, Fatehpuria said, is correctness.
鈥淏ecause we operate in financial services, the bar for correctness is very high. We鈥檙e not going to random websites and pulling information to answer questions. We鈥檙e carefully vetting the data vendors, carefully vetting what data is being used. The tolerance for errors is much lower, especially when it鈥檚 right in your brokerage account.鈥
And looking out a year? 鈥淵ou鈥檙e going to have to stay tuned for that for the most part,鈥 he said. 鈥淏ut at a high level, we think about AI from how can it best assist active traders? Active traders are the ones consuming lots of data to come up with unique edge and unique insights that they can trade on. So that鈥檚 one angle. And the second, more medium-to-long-term angle we鈥檝e been thinking about with AI is how do we meaningfully give you financial guidance?鈥
Why he鈥檚 still at Robinhood
Almost ten years at one company is rare in tech. Asked what keeps him excited, Fatehpuria pointed to the roadmap and his team.
鈥淲e have infinite ambition. The roadmap is packed. We always have things we鈥檙e saying no to. We鈥檙e not searching for things to say yes to, which is a sign that the roadmap is full. We have lots of products to build.鈥
He pointed to AI, private markets through and other technology trends as areas the company is investing in. 鈥淭here鈥檚 just so many interesting things that we can do and are doing. In addition to that, the talent density at the company is very high. So I get a lot of enjoyment working with everyone here.鈥
To make sure you get accurate and helpful information, this guide has been edited by as part of our .
was produced by and reviewed and distributed by 爆料TV.